Sharron Angle's last-minute decision to pull out of a planned debate has angered long-time Nevada political journalist Jon Ralston.Skipping a debate, in and of itself, doesn't hurt a campaign. After all, candidates reject debate invitations all of the time.
"Earlier today, Sharron Angle's campaign agreed to accept our invitation to debate Harry Reid on 'Face to Face' in an hour-long live broadcast from Reno on October 21st. Within hours of Reid accepting, Angle's campaign called to say, well, it's backing out now," Ralston said on the local news show "Face to Face" Thursday. He then played a clip of Angle saying she would like to have a debate on the show with Reid.
"I thought I had seen it all in this campaign. I guess not[.]"
But the timing of this is quite remarkable, and thus problematic. It shows that Angle is afraid to debate Reid -- not the type of message a candidate wants to send to the electorate.
What's more, while the opinions of one columnist do not an election sway, it can't be good to so publicly embarrass a leading political voice in one's state. Generally, "earned media" entails earning positive press from reporters. Unfortunately for the Republicans, the only earned media coming Angle's way is negative press.
0 comments:
Post a Comment