Today Nate Silver delved a bit deeper into the cell-only voter numbers and found the trend wasn't limited to McClatchy polling, or Pew polling discussed here.
The polls that were conducted without cellphones showed Republicans ahead by an average of 9.3 points; those with them showed a smaller, 4.8-point advantage. That’s a difference of 4 or 5 points (and one which is statistically significant at the 95 percent confidence threshold), which is about of the same magnitude that Pew identified.As Silver said, this doesn't mean that Democrats should bank on performing as much as 5 percentage points better on election day than polls currently project. That said, a whole lot of polling -- especially statewide and district-level polling -- has not included cell-only voters. If these voters do show up -- and that remains an "if," considering that they are generally considered to be low-propensity voters -- the results could look very different than many are expecting.
Thing is, the percentage of cell-only adults is not evenly distributed across the U.S. Thus the underpolling effect would be largest where there are more cell-only individuals. To what extent there are more, less, or average in swing districts would affect how much of surprise there will be.
ReplyDelete